Apple came out to vehemently defend itself on privacy issues Wednesday highlighting that although it has been compelled to pay a huge class action for privacy breaches the company has never made money or shared user data from its Siri service.
The beyond follows a $95 million agreement reached over claims that the technology company has been surreptitiously capturing users’ private conversations due to the Siri’s accidental activation.
These recordings, plaintiffs claimed were later relayed to third-party advertisers – a factor that Apple has time and again dismissed as false.
Smart virtual voice assistants like the apple’s Siri is built to come on when certain voice commands which are regarded as hot words are spoken, such as ‘Hey Siri’. Nevertheless, the said technology is triggered from time to time unintentionally, hence raising alarms over privacy among users.
In the case of the settlement signed last week, the willing and qualified Apple customers could be paid up to $20 per every device supported by Siri, including iPhones and Apple Watches. However, those arguing for the soft characterization of the company’s action to the extent of arriving at the settlement terms did not admit to any wrong doing.
In its Wednesday statement released, Apple was forced to admit that Siri data was not used to create marketing profiles; the entity was never sold to anyone for any purpose or made available to advertisers.
The technology company based in Cupertino sought to give users more information about how their data is processed, pointing out that servers have to be involved at times to enable some of the features such as Siri.
‘Apple stresses that it does not save audio interactions between users and Siri unless the user signs up for that particular purpose, assisting Apple in improving Siri,’ the company said.
They also committed themselves in developing technology that would further improve Siri’s privacy markers.
This is not the first time Apple has faced criticism over the privacy of voice assistants; a similar case is being heard in the San Jose federal court against Google’s Voice Assistant.
Most importantly, the same law firms that are representing the plaintiffs in the Apple case are also litigating the Google case, which gives an evidence of beyond-individual problems related to voice assistant technologies’ privacy policies.
The report and its follow-on clarification show the rising conflict between efficiency and privacy in the post-digital age, as customers become more conscious of how their data may be harvested and used by tech-related businesses.
Even so, given the amount of the compensation, consistent with its general Strategy, Apple maintains a strict principled position on its privacy policies, positioning the company as a technology industry avatar, defending users’ rights to privacy.
